Alex Smith on Wed, 27 May 2009 11:51:23 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] An Immodest Proposal

On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 12:57 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> /* The following proposal/PoO (depending on the current ruleset)
> merges the essential elements of the current Agoran rules with the
> essential elements of the probably-current B Nomic rules; the intent
> is to create a game that is recognizably B but with some of the
> stability of Agora. In general, rules numbering less than 100 are
> inessential B Nomic rules (with the exception of the very essential
> Rule 0), rules numbered 101-200 are significant Agoran rules, rules
> numbered 201-300 are essential B Nomic rules, and rules numbered 301
> or higher are either new rules introduced to help fuse the two
> rulesets or rules that fused corresponding rules out of both old
> rulesets. This strips us of contract law and gameplay, both of which
> ought to be reinserted either by non-emergent means or by subsequent
> Points of Order. */

If we're under the Agora-like ruleset - and I think we are - you'll have
to set its Adoption Index to at least 3 for it to work.


spoon-discuss mailing list