Kerim Aydin on Tue, 26 May 2009 10:19:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44

On Mon, 25 May 2009, 0x44 wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> This is CFJ 5. I assign it to Judge 0x44.
>> 5 (District Inquiry)
>> The page at
>> contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current
>> rules.
> The first line of Proposal 1945 states clearly that the entire ruleset is to be 
> replaced with the contents of the page at the above historical Bn wiki link. To 
> do so would require the complete removal of the original ruleset and the 
> subsequent (and necessarily simultaneous) emplacement of the new rules. Since 
> no individual rule was specified, the ruleset was repealed and enacted in toto. 
> Additionally, it seems improper to set aside a UNANIMOUS decision on a 
> Democratic proposal, any ambiguity that may have arisen from Proposal 1945 must 
> be ignored in deference to the will of the Players.
> I answer CFJ 5 TRUE.

So what happened when partway through the process the rules defining
rule changes disappeared entirely?  What order did everything happen
in?  If it was all repealed first, then there was no way to enact 
anything.  If it was done one by one, there might have been moments
when the process broke.    -G.

spoon-discuss mailing list