Alex Smith on Tue, 26 May 2009 09:50:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 09:14 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2009, comex wrote:
> > I intend to appeal this with two support.  Rule 105 explicitly disallows 
> > simultaneous rule changes.  If those specified by the proprosal are necessarily 
> > simultaneous, they cannot occur at all.
> I support.  -G.
I support, and think we should patch round this with a proposal that
works in both rulesets. Also get rid of AI, it's a rather Agoran


spoon-discuss mailing list