Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2

Geoffrey Spear on Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:50:42 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2
From: Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:50:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <55b258c20902140816i5e523909s561bf42c5fcbda51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <C41235FC-9B29-49D5-861B-58DBF41E80B2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4996E21B.6040905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902140816i5e523909s561bf42c5fcbda51@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I vote FOR this Point of Order, and AGAINST the one that mentions Agora.

The AGAINST vote here is ambiguous; at the time of the vote 2 PoOs
mentioned Agora.

-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oh for god's sake, let's collapse the gamestate
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] PoO 2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread