| Elliott Hird on Sat, 6 Dec 2008 06:56:12 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] ais523's Refresh Proposal |
On 6 Dec 2008, at 04:07, comex wrote: > I dunno, is that sufficiently clear? Welp. In Monopoly, if it turns out that someone got money ages ago that they didn't actually get according to the rules, and are now broke or something, (although this would be very rare...) I'd imagine it'd just be ignored. That is, rule violations succeed, but in most games anyone can just undo them implicitly. My wording explicitly handles such cases. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss