Jamie Dallaire on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:17:27 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Paranoid


On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Elliott Hird <
penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 26 Nov 2008, at 21:08, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
> > That obviously wasn't "carefully".  And that alone could be fixed
> > (which
> > was what my RP set out to do).
>
> Carefulness does not seem to be in the era 4 spirit.


About that... Given that carelessness with numbers affected at least 3
proposals voted on in nweek 151....

I was thinking, proto:

Do away with Rule numbers. Rules may be referred to exclusively by name.
Advantage: no accidental repeal of important rules. no accidental attempts
to amend different rules than those intended.
Disadvantage: constant need to look up rules' exact names. A little bit like
0x44's old name, though not as bad ;-)

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss