Alex Smith on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:35:05 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency


On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 12:31 -0400, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> I think if players of B (the current PEPs) aren't reading their
> spoon-business mail (or even if they've deregistered), that is their
> problem. Messaging spoon-business constitutes a quite valid attempt to reach
> everyone concerned.
> 
> Besides, wouldn't Wooble's proposition, if true, imply that pretty much
> every emergency we've had (at least since I got here) has been invalid, and
> some really really old emergency has only just now been initiated? And if
> so, shouldn't we be using some really really old emergency procedure rules?
> 
> BP
The emergency's still valid if PEPs haven't been notified; it's just
that anyone can change the forum by notifying everyone if people were
missed out (rule 4e0 section 3). Presumably Wooble's trying just that.
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss