Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic

Taral on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:16:54 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
From: Taral <taralx@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:16:48 -0700
In-reply-to: <55b258c20810141900s5c3ec693ka3dba95c53e77e9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240810140828s79ccdb02s187a8d0a704e6b86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F53CD3.8050705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280810141812y1a3f35bfp8da2862a37954adc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F54822.2050502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810141900s5c3ec693ka3dba95c53e77e9b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No Contract may be submitted whose text is not provided, in
> unencrypted form, in the e-mail message in which the text is
> submitted.

I'm not a fan of the use of "unencrypted". Can we use something less
specific, like "unobscured" or "plain" or ...?

-- 
Taral <taralx@xxxxxxxxx>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
    -- Unknown
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread