Jay Campbell on Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:14:02 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] So long, and thanks for all the Fish!


> oneself.  "All ministries I can Usurp" does not describe a unique set
> of targets for ehird's Usurp action.  ehird cannot usurp the set of
> all ministries with a Reward of less than m70; he can only usurp one
> of 3 subsets of that set; which subset isn't specified. "I usurp each
> Ministry I could afford to usurp before I posted this message" seems
> closer to your interpretation, which might either fail or create a
> 3-way split in gamestate (if I'm the Priest sorting it out, I'd say it
> fails as being too vague, but the rules might be written poorly enough
> to allow for either to be a reasonable interpretation of Doctrine),
> but as written I'd say the action just fails to accurately describe a
> valid target at all.
>   

Agreed. Some sort of "in alphabetical order, I attempt to ..." clause 
would have worked.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss