Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

ihope on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:33:33 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:33:26 -0500
In-reply-to: <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <277041.36087.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141641t1d502337j92bfb430d16070a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 14/01/2008, Spencer Baugh <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> oops. Claim that to be Inconsistent, I accidentally didn't include the
> entire Oracularity. Or is it still included even though it's quoted?

Your Oracularity:

> I submit the following Oracularity:
> Remove all occurrences of the text between the quotation marks from the
> Rules: "There is no Rule 4E41."
> Repeal any Rule that has no text.

Was there more you wanted to add?

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Spencer Baugh

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Ministry of Time Bulletin
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Question for the Referee
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread