Ed Murphy on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:46:29 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41


0x44 wrote:

> Mike McGann wrote:
>> On Jan 14, 2008 7:44 PM, Spencer Baugh <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>   
>>> oops. Claim that to be Inconsistent, I accidentally didn't include the
>>> entire Oracularity. Or is it still included even though it's quoted?
>>>     
>> Looks fine to me.
>>
>> I claim this as Consistent
> There are no rules that have no text.

But there might be, mid-Oracularity-application.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss