Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections

shadowfirebird on Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:42:11 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:42:03 +0000
In-reply-to: <2f4350400701170929g32d9853fx509c9162b00eaef8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <45AE58FE.5060103@xxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400701170929g32d9853fx509c9162b00eaef8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've been thinking about this.

My personal opinion is that it should take a majority vote to unseat
an existing post holder.  And the simplest way of doing that is by
proposal.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended proposal "currency"
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] amending: more elections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread