Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Conflict resolution

["Jake Eakle" <jseakle@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why does the oldest one win, instead of the newest? Also, are dates in
n-time or earth-time? What if two rules say they override each other? Why
should changing some irrelevant part of a rule affect it's precedence?

Very sorry if this sounds harsh or anything - It's just really late/early,
and I don't have time to write things out more... nicely.

On 11/22/06, Andy Jones <shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Proposal: "Conflict resoluton"
>
> 1) Change rule 1-8 to add at the end:
> {{Every rule has an amendment date.  This is a date.  There can only
> be one amendment date per rule.}}
>
> 2) Change all existing rules to add, as its amendment date, the date
> that the rule was last changed.
>
> 3) Change rule 2-2; add the following at the end:
> {{Each rule created or amended by the proposal has its amendment date
> updated to the date the proposal passed.}}
>
> 4) Add a new rule titled "conflict resolution":
> {{When two or more rules conflict, one rule "wins" and the rest are
> ignored.
>
> If one rule says it overrides the others, that rule wins; otherwise,
> if one rule is of a type that overrides the other rules' type(s), then
> that rule wins; otherwise, the rule with the oldest creation date
> wins.
>
> If this rule conflicts with another rule, this rule wins.}}
>
> --
> It's Like This
>
> Even the Samurai
> Have teddy bears
> And even the teddy bears
> Get drunk
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss