Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

That's why I'm confused, then...

On 11/22/06, antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's the way it is already
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx" <shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:52:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-d] let's call them bdays and bweeks and so on 2
>
> I've just discovered this.  I agree, it's non-perfect.
>
> Could we set the reply-to for business to the discussion list?
>
> On 11/22/06, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This does make sense, except that when a player replies to a message
> > on -business, they may or may not be doing business. When the reply-
> > to for -business was -business, we frequently got nonbusiness on the
> > list, because players would just hit "reply". As it stands right now,
> > the reply-to for -business is -discuss, which prevents that, but
> > which sometimes means that a player meaning to post to -business
> > accidentally sends to -discuss. One method of combating this was to
> > allow a Minister in charge of tracking something to recognize
> > relevant action that were sent to the wrong forum; e would be
> > required to notify the business forum that e was doing this.
> >
> > Or we could just change the reply-to so that -business replies to
> > itself by default, and we could live with the inevitable scraps of
> > discussion on -business.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>


-- 
It's Like This

Even the Samurai
Have teddy bears
And even the teddy bears
Get drunk
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss