Phil Ulrich on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:34:23 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached

a) Yes.
b) No.

On Nov 26, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Jeremy Cook wrote:

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:43:11PM -0600, Joel Uckelman wrote:
Thus spake SkArcher:

What I would propose is a third forum: Spoon-notices

This forum would be for rules-mandated posts - Anything that was automated would post here, and this would be where the ballot was posted. The Reply
To: header for s-n would be s-b

Hey, do you guys still want this? I'm back in "do-things-long-neglected" mode
for a few days---I'll do it this evening if it's still needed.

That would be better than the current system. I don't think the
business/discuss distinction is currently useful: my ideal would be to
just have one player forum. I do think an automated forum would be

I call a Straw Poll with two parts:

a) add a s-n forum: Yes/No

b) abolish b/d distinction: Yes/No

spoon-discuss mailing list

spoon-discuss mailing list