Daniel Lepage on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 01:06:24 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached

On Nov 26, 2004, at 5.16 PM, Jeremy Cook wrote:

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:43:11PM -0600, Joel Uckelman wrote:
Thus spake SkArcher:

What I would propose is a third forum: Spoon-notices

This forum would be for rules-mandated posts - Anything that was automated would post here, and this would be where the ballot was posted. The Reply
To: header for s-n would be s-b

Hey, do you guys still want this? I'm back in "do-things-long-neglected" mode
for a few days---I'll do it this evening if it's still needed.

That would be better than the current system. I don't think the
business/discuss distinction is currently useful: my ideal would be to
just have one player forum. I do think an automated forum would be

I call a Straw Poll with two parts:

a) add a s-n forum: Yes/No

b) abolish b/d distinction: Yes/No

a) Yes, b) No.

While a notices forum would be useful, I quite appreciate the distinction between business and discuss. I filter them into separate folders, which makes it easy when I'm pressed for time to figure out what needs dealing with and what can be read later at my leisure.


"What is improbable is extremely probable."
   - Aristotle

spoon-discuss mailing list