Jeremy Cook on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:24:38 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:15:07AM -0800, Dan Schmidt wrote:
> When I say "indistingush" I mean "use rule 699/1 as a
> loophole".
> All actions that change the gamestate are illegal
> under 393/0.

No, only the ones that aren't legal by some other rule.

spoon-discuss mailing list