Jeremy Cook on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:24:04 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] Looptek (Win)

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:35:32AM -0800, Dan Schmidt wrote:
> Yes it's true; I have Yet Another Loophole.
> Behold! Rule 216/1
> {{
> To "propose a rule" is defined to mean making a
> proposal which contains one Action, which is to create
> a Rule.[snip]  
> }}
> Thus making a rule is an Action.
> I do the aforemetioned Action. and make a rule with
> the name Looptek
> {{
> Rodney may, as a Game Action,Gain 1 point.
> Rodney may also, as a Game Action, modify or delete a
> rule.
> }}

That's not a legal Action, as it changes the gamestate and no rule gives
you the power to create rules.

spoon-discuss mailing list