Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Votes

[Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:28:16AM -0700, Jake Eakle wrote:
> 
> > Proposal 1915/0: Tomatoes
> > Shelve [what does it mean for a vine to be planted "in the Town
> > Square"?]
> The attribute "in the Town Square" does not actually define a location
> within the game. It is merely a marker to denote that tomatoes from that
> Vine can be picked by any player without penalty.
> 

That makes sense, but in the Prop:
There exists a Communal Vine, which has the attribute "In the Town
Square". This Vine is considered to have been planted at the beginning
of nweek 71. No player owns this Vine, nor may any player claim a Free
Throw against any other player picking a Tomato from it. If a Tomato
falls off a Communal Vine, it plants itself in the Town Square. Any and
all Vines in the Town Square are Communal Vines.

you say that a vine 'plants itself in the Town Square'.

> > Proposal 1916/0: There is a rainbow
> > Shelve [If a card is stained with Tomato Juice, what color is it
> > stained?]
> It is stained 'unreadable'. If a color card were stained, it would do
> nothing when played. Yes, the flavor is lost a little here, because the
> rainbow cards have no text to be stained, but the tomato rule states that
> any stained card will have no effect when played. 

Araltaln's prop says:
  The "Apple White" card may be used as a "wild card" to make any
sequence, but using it means the sequence is worth ~30 less (Thus a
sequence of Orange, Yellow, Apple White, Blue would only score ~50). If
the Apple White card has been stained in any way, it is can only
acceptably be substituted for the colour it has been stained.

which seems to conflict with this unless we add a color 'Tomato'.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss