SkArcher on Sun, 30 May 2004 16:52:53 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Straw Poll on the Government Turnover


On Sun, 30 May 2004 17:48:18 -0400 (EDT), Zarpint <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Daniel Lepage wrote:


On May 28, 2004, at 12.15 AM, Zarpint wrote:
> I don't understand how this is just an implementation detail. In 1,
> I can do any of the tasks in any of the Ministries. In 2, I can only
> do the tasks I am responsible for as a Minister. If you're saying I
> can at any point borrow any Ministry, do the task, and return it,
> then we have 1 with a lot of excess stuff.

Well, what do you mean by "I can do any of the tasks in any of the
Ministries"? If you mean, "I can do any of the tasks even if it was
supposed to be done yesterday, I only just decided to do it, and
somebody else has already done it", then you're right, the Ministries
system is significantly different. And also much better.

Scratch "somebody else has already done it", and that's what I mean.


What I'm getting at is a system to ensure that we don't have multiple
people trying to fill a given ministry at random. And yes, that does
mean that you won't always be allowed to do any task. You can do any
task *provided that somebody else isn't already doing it*.

Specific example:

Task Foo is done by the Ministry of Bar. It was supposed to be done at
the beginning of nday 3.

It is now sometime after midnight UTC, and Foo has not been done. If I
am not at all associated with the Ministry of Bar, may I now do the task?

No one is already doing it. Someone is supposed to be doing it, but e might
do it in an hour or e might never do it.

If the answer is "Yes, I may do it", then we have Open Source. And we may
have multiple people trying to fill in randomly, so to prevent that, we
should probably have a real-time list where someone can click and say,
"I am now doing this task."

If the answer is "No, I need to wait for someone in the Ministry to do it,
or call a Vote of No-Confidence after X ndays", then we have Ministries.

Hmmm, on consideration it is apparent that the "Open Source" theory will suffer the same problems as the Telephone did. Making any specific time-frame for a single action to be performed by it's nature makes it vulnerable to, if you will excuse the term, "camping" the event


--
SkArcher _______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss