[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Taking back the game

[Rob Speer <rspeer@xxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:59:34PM -0500, Mark Karasek wrote:
> You seem to be confusing the rationale for my actions as part of the 
> ruleset, which it is not (note that that text did not have a "Rule #" 
> heading, therefore was not a rule). Since this qualifies as a dispute over 
> the rules, I rule (per rule 6) that the ruleset consists of the text within 
> the {{ }}-delimited block; therefore, your actions are invalid. (Don't 
> worry, I fully intend to restore the ruleset once it's generally agreed 
> that I win.)

Your ruleset was "the following", which had two sections, one in
parentheses and the other in double curly braces. In other
circumstances, it may have been difficult to tell which one to pay
attention to - but the first one was not only first, but it was marked
as the Rationale behind the whole thing, obviously making it more
important.

So at this point you would rule-6 me and I would CFI you, and neither of
us is speaking the other's language.

In the event that people follow your interpretation of the ruleset,
go ahead and claim your Win, but could you put back the rules the way I
did? I really want to get Political Go going.
-- 
Rob Speer

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss