Glotmorf on 21 May 2002 13:27:13 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proosal: Violent green. 

On 5/21/02 at 7:06 AM Gavin Doig wrote:

><proosal>
><title>Violent green.</title>
><body>
>Create a new rule, titled "Not the same as apathy.", with a chutzpah of 5,
>and the following @@@-delimited text:
>@@@
>A player may become Disinterested by stating that they are doing so. At
>this time they are removed from any groups or football teams they are in,
>fumble the football if they have it, and are placed in Limbo if they are
>not there already.
>
>Disinterested players:
>Have a score, charm, and entropy of 0.
>Are not eligible to receive the sushi, the scarf, the token of proposals,
>or the immunity idol.
>May not play football.
>Are in Limbo.
>May not give, and are not eligible to receive, a Kick in the Ass.
>May not be in a group.
>Are treated as if they have the Immunity Idol.
>Are not eligible to receive the Immunity Idol.
>
>This rule takes precedence over any other which would otherwise alter the
>state of a Disinterested player to be in conflict with this rule.
>@@@
>[[Have I missed anything? All I really want to leave are proosing and
>judging. Oh, and voting.]]
>
>The player who submitted this proposal becomes Disinterested.
></body>
></proosal>
>
>uin.

How about adding a provision for once again becoming Interested?

Hey, it could happen.

Aside from that...perhaps, "May not possess, receive, acquire and/or purchase Objects"?

						Glotmorf