Jay Campbell on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:21:56 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] contract

The contract below fails to have any effect. A stated obligation is not 
automatically an enforceable obligation, and does not affect the 
gamestate any more than a clause "Wooble must change all player names to 

The consultation following lacks a Question and is ZOTted.

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I become bound by the following contract:
>> {{
>> Wooble is obligated to create a new Rule with the text: "The player
>> named Wooble may change the gamestate in any way, at any time."
>> Wooble is obligated to amend Rule 4E70 by removing: "When a Player
>> becomes obligated to perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract,
>> that Game Action is performed as if the Player had sent it to the
>> public forum."
>> }}
> As authorized by Rule 4E70, I hereby submit a Consultation indicating
> that Wooble has failed to add the above-quoted rule and amend Rule
> 4E70.  I note that if I indeed failed, the priest is obligated to
> force these actions through in an Oracularity, as that is the only
> equitable resolution.

spoon-business mailing list