Re: [s-b] [s-d] If we're going to keep taking game actions through the emergency...

["Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> As the only party I will happily not object to me changing it, if you
>> have a suggestion.
>
>
> First thing that comes to mind would be to make vote obligations contingent
> upon the state of parties' platforms at the start of nday 11 or so. Gives
> everyone time to set up their platforms as they wish. New parties who join
> during the voting period but after nday 11 just don't count for the nweek's
> voting.

I intend, without objection by any party within a jiffy, to amend the
Pocketbook Party by inserting at the beginning of the second paragraph
the sentence {Parties to this contract may not modify their platforms
or take any game actions which would cause those platforms to be
modified during a voting period. }

I intend, without objection by any party within a jiffy, to amend the
Neo-Dadaist Alliance for Creampuff Rights by inserting at the
beginning of the second paragraph the sentence {Parties to this
contract may not modify their platforms or take any game actions which
would cause those platforms to be modified during a voting period. }
and by replacing the phrase {has no points} in that contract with {has
fewer than five points}.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business