Re: [s-d] [s-b] If you want time shenanigans, you shall have them

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Proposal 1-11 is itself a statement of relevant resulting temporal changes
whilst Proposal 1-7 is not.

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Per Rule 3-8, I nullify the submission of Proposal 1-11 as it does not
> include the statement of relevant resulting changes from changing the rules
> from the beginning of the Eighth Era.
>
> [[Obviously, this only has any meaning if Proposal 1-11 passed. Or will
> pass. Or passed in a different time reference frame. Or something. I
> think.]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss