Re: [s-d] [s-b] a modest refresh proposal

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. This will be the basis for my alternate interpretation as soon as
I have time to stare at the entire archive.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:03 PM,  <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Under this interpretation, wouldn't all previous Refresh Proposals to ever have been submitted have taken effect?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I submit the following document as a Refresh Proposal:
>>
>> {{
>> As permitted by clause 5 of Rule 0.1, I, the Refresh Proposal talking
>> to you now, do hereby change Rule 0, adding the following sentence at
>> the end of Clause 1:
>>
>>  {{ Events defined by this Rule continue to take place as specified
>> by this Rule.}}
>>
>> I also destroy all Refresh Proposals besides myself, and formally
>> recognize the following list of Outsiders as being in the game:
>>
>> {{
>> Geoffrey Spear
>> Sean Hunt
>> Elliot Hird
>> Jonathan Rouillard
>> Daniel Lautman
>> }}
>>
>> I cause each Player (but probably not their associated Outsiders) to
>> stop recognizing there is an Emergency. I end the Procedure.
>> }}
>>
>> --
>> Wooble
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss