Justin Ahmann on Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:07:04 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Roster |
I believe that the critical sequence of events was something like this: 1) B enters an Emergency. 2) Wooble becomes Emergency Coordinator. 3) Wooble submits a Refresh Proposal amounting to "End the game." 4) Nobody else submits any Refresh Proposals before the window for submissions closes. 5) Wooble resigns, rather than selecting the one Refresh Proposal that exists. Codae ________________________________ From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wed, September 5, 2012 3:48:33 PM Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Roster On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hmm, why not start from an assumption that we have that ruleset, and try > to fix everything from inside it? I'm in, albeit I don't think anyone has ever explained the situation to me in enough detail to make me accept that B is dead (I think someone, maybe you, tried when the trophy rule is passed, but I didn't buy it; perhaps my usual skepticism at your pedanticism is unwarranted here, but I can't find the relevant IRC log, anyway), and I suspect that for some reason or other it got stuck before it had a chance to die, though I have no proof. So I vote for someday finding a reason why this is the old B after all... _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss