Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

0x44 on Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:04:43 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:04:33 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAHd7M8=GMiKVc7+aKcXkQ+=A0xgGcG_t9DWbj45+=b99euVY8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACeGREiAMZ7+qGxOMjFQXvgJY3r5CcMn5pRJqc-E8hjgKbcNng@mail.gmail.com> <1346705080.2837.19.camel@desert> <77C2E569-AEAE-477E-83FF-A78E3A02895D@indistinct.org> <CAHd7M8=GMiKVc7+aKcXkQ+=A0xgGcG_t9DWbj45+=b99euVY8Q@mail.gmail.com>

Are you sure?

- 0x44

On Sep 7, 2012, at 15:02, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:17 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Has anyone attempted to use the ontological argument to prove that we
>> exist under a working B ruleset
>> 
> 
> I do exist regardless of a working B ruleset.
> 
> // Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Mike McGann

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread