Kerim Aydin on Wed, 5 Sep 2012 09:33:24 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] (no subject) |
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 5 September 2012 16:37, Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > IMO, a game is a ruleset and a set of players who agree they are using that > > ruleset as an instance of play of that ruleset. > > You forgot the game state (of which the ruleset is arguably a part, > although it also defines the game state, so that may be uncomfortably > circular for some). The "game state" is what the players generally agree it is, so I would put that as part of "the players that agree they're playing a particular instance". No I'm not a Platonist about this. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss