| Daniel Lepage on Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:13:04 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] I agree |
12. -- Wonko On Apr 6, 2012 11:59 PM, "Ed Murphy" <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > comex wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:40 PM, 0x44<bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> I disagree with the below-quoted determination as it was neither "Yes", >>> "No", or "Maybe". I call for Determination on the following statement, >>> "Hose is in violation of rule 22E4.3, for failing to make a determination >>> that was truthful." >>> >>> I am It, but as the callee I recuse myself. The Burden of Determination >>> falls onto Comex. I become It. I tag base, and call Time-Out. >>> >> >> Due to the Time-Out I am unable to deliver Judgement, so I transfer >> the case to the appropriate Minister pending reprocessing. >> >> Since Hose is still a Ninny, I confiscate eir hat. >> > > I yell CREAMPUFF. > ______________________________**_________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/**mailman/listinfo/spoon-**business<http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business> > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss