Re: [s-d] Huh

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wouldn't it be more fun for each person to submit an infinite number of identical (to their own) RPs? 

-- 
0x44


On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jamie Ahloy Dallaire wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Elliott Hird <
> penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > That doesn't help us unless we have a way to cause RPs to do things,
> > no? "Any player can create a qwerty. Qwerties can enact arbitrary
> > changes to the rules." doesn't imply "Players can cause qwerties to
> > enact arbitrary changes to the rules".
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> Good point. I suggest we submit an near-infinite number of identical RPs,
> then wait a week. By then, the probability that not a single one of these
> RPs will have enacted its changes yet will be very close to zero. And we
> don't need to get hung up on such unlikely possibilities, do we?
> 
> JAD aka Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx (mailto:spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx)
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss