Re: [s-d] Huh

[Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 15:22 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Rule 0 states, in part:
> >
> > Players may each submit a Refresh Proposal. Refresh Proposals may
> > affect any aspect of the Game or the state of the Game, including, but
> > not limited to: rules, scores or other player attributes, the valid
> > list of players, the identity of the Host, the legitimacy and/or
> > actuality of any action taken in the context of the Game, etc.
> >
> > Theory that's probably less insane than many other theories of B
> > gamestate: This explicitly allows RPs to make those changes whether
> > they're adopted or not, so it doesn't matter if the Clock works since
> > an RP can just fix Rule 0 to work correctly.
> 
> Now there's a hell of a Woobleverse for you. I like it.

Wooble and I have been discussing a few scams that might get B back on
track.

If our current Emergency rule is approximately similar to the last one,
there's another scam that could work: by my reading, the Pause-dependent
rules are along the lines of summary of rule, timing restriction, full
description. However, the way it's worded, the timing restriction only
appears to apply to the full description. Thus, we may be able to have a
valid Emergency based purely on the summaries.

The same reasoning means you don't have to be a player to submit an RP.
I'd be submitting an RP to get us back on track right now, if I knew
what the Emergency rule actually /was/. (Wooble noted that the Emergency
Coordinator doesn't have to select one of the /submitted/ RPs in the
case of a tie at 0 votes; any RP will do.)

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss