Re: [s-d] [s-b] The current gamestates, as I understand them

[Sean Hunt <scshunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

no

I'm confused enough that I'm considering writing an alternate and slightly
more sensible initial set of rules before advertising the start of the nomic
elsewhere and then proclaiming a start.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 17:32, Paul VanKoughnett <allispaul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've been lurking on this list for a while, and will probably actually
> join the game since you've started a new one.  But for now I'm just
> dropping in to say: in what way did the proposals state an explicit
> intention to modify only that document?  Presumably, they (implicitly)
> intended to modify two documents -- the two extant rulesets -- and one
> of those intentions automatically failed.
>
> --Paul
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Eric Stucky <turiski.nomic@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Haha, I think I like the new proposal more than "re-move law 4". Yes.
> >
> > > No outstanding proposals, since quotation marks aren't curly brackets.
> > Yeah, and while law 9 doesn't make it illegal, it probably makes it
> pretty useless.
> >
> > [ -Turiski ]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss