Re: [s-d] Time for Γ?

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There's already been a C nomic or ten,  maybe we should call it C♭nomic...

- chris 

On Jul 17, 2011, at 2:17, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 2011/7/17 Sean Hunt <scshunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> I wasn't able to find the original emergency rule in the archives.
>> 
>> And B shall indeed lay dormant forever, but there is no reason to not start
>> its spiritual successor after so many years of fantasy gameplay - we should
>> start a real nomic and hopefully not kill it right away.
> 
> Well, I suggest it be named C Nomic, as a fake rule pretended to be
> called during those years of imagined gameplay.
> 
> And hell, I suggest that the base ruleset start with an ultra-platonic
> definition of what constitutes an "entity"/"object" and various
> attributes on it and their types. B pretended to try and do this in
> its imaginary fourth era, but if you're going to not do something, you
> should not do it _well_.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss