| Alex Smith on Wed, 11 May 2011 11:27:41 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Suggested new ruleset |
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 19:18 +0100, M P Darke wrote: > A "plurality", which is a subgroup which is greater than any other > subgroup, should suffice, no? That would be a recipe for scams and chaos. The idea was that the gamestate just stayed the same if there was a difference of opinion as to what it was. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss