|
Jonathan Rouillard on Tue, 10 May 2011 12:18:06 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] Suggested new ruleset
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] Suggested new ruleset
- From: Jonathan Rouillard <jonathan.rouillard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:18:00 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SKmhPyNLdti1URx3ccLoLJk7UK848JT/7mS1FF2H894=; b=aA4k46ycVEnwVv1hrH+LMn8J+EiLWTyNQI62cw1wqtFkIJ7IOLQ02p/wh+vqKQAhjS P2/z9suZreEvCSQWGv4qo000rY+0BM2uu6lvt+fphBTYvk3KbSroorSdTmxlPcDj28t7 ZuCVT1WPMmtpPCK8BMcRdoCzDuzd5x7JhWeuk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=T6964adsKu4WvRQpZeMwMLIYWbTRKI/EnlDfGLm46RXigOrvBrZzvZvnymKEMFiQrj ytMfvC9vIpbQVrR0/xEP40K9sXaoxb/6c48+qpLA1+NuaKG+WMy5KOEHir8702P3LkF7 4p/8zNOm4LlLMaDpnaXvXZyF57KuKK9SFtiRM=
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=e=XLY_c-Qc7thMg8t+MWw=Un=fg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <BANLkTi=G23ozMbpd2emXNpC54NhEahz3Uw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=8YkGBd+Q78A3cpaweG89Dt50x5g@mail.gmail.com> <1304970856.2059.19.camel@desert> <BANLkTi=2mZOkj9JbvN9WzxO7P8fx5WO07Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikFY0ziov2o-7jhkangQxsawRxW4w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikaW8a1Rg+rPkgXqpzP9XWuanBHMA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=e=XLY_c-Qc7thMg8t+MWw=Un=fg@mail.gmail.com>
Srue, every player should see the RP submissions, but...
> anybody can distribute a list of Refresh Proposals,
> identified by their author, to a majority of players.
Doesn't that mean that the final list doesn't have to be distributed
to every player? Sure, it's not game-breaking - and even then, it
wouldn't be a "problem". But still, it feels odd. =P
~ Roujo
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10 May 2011 17:10, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Everyone already gets every RP individually.
>
> Well, every player. The fact that anybody at all can distribute an
> RP/vote is for cases when the list of players is messed up.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss