Re: [s-d] [s-b] Moving On...

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I remember an incident in B in which a player (probably you) pointed out that 
retroactive date-stamps would appear to have been received earlier than in 
actuality.  There was a minor scam (something like usurping a Ministry without 
letting anyone object) involved.

Codae




________________________________
From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, December 14, 2010 5:35:41 AM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Moving On...

On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 00:22 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There it is! This message was actually sent a little over 22 hours before it
> > arrived. My stupid webmail crashed when I attempted to send it, and said it 
>got
> > sent, but apparently it got lost in the system for awhile. Please regard it 
>as
> > having been sent at approx 23:55 Dec. 12, 2010 (UTC).
> 
> We will regard it as sent then, but when you click "send" is
> irrelevant. (This is to prevent scams involving falsified headers,
> which I believe have happened at some point in Nomic history, possibly
> even in B.)

If it did happen, it was probably my fault. I remember sending forged
headers to at least one email nomic, maybe two, several months ago,
mostly just to see what would happen. (Agora, at least, because
"Any action performed by sending a message is performed at the time
date-stamped on that message."; I was hoping to cause an argument about
which date counted.)

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss