Re: [s-d] [s-b] This game is boring, let's have an Emergency.

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Zero divided by one is zero. 

- 0x44

On Dec 9, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Then how did my usurpation attempt get stopped by just one objector?
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 1:02:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b]   This game is boring, let's have an Emergency.
>> 
>> No it isn't, N Consent of B defaults to 1. So the ratio of objections to 
>> support  has to be greater than or equal to one.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:46  PM, Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>> 
>>> Not problematic at all. In times of  ambiguity, you would just Declare an 
>>> Emergency. Anyone who was a Player  at the last time of non-ambiguity would 
>> be 
>> 
>>> eligible to vote in the  Emergency. However, even if your status is ambiguous 
>> 
>>> now, the  Registrar's Report from Nweek 181 was published more than 14 days 
>> ago 
>> 
>>> and is now considered fact, per Rule 45, and you weren't on it. Since you 
>>> haven't been a Player at any time since then, you were most definitely  NOT a 
>> 
>>> Player at the last point of non-ambiguity (whenever it was), and  you 
>> therefore 
>> 
>>> can't vote in an Emergency.
>>> 
>>> Also, since  Marr965 objected to the initiation of an Emergency, and an 
>> Emergency 
>> 
>>> requires "Consent of B", not "N Consent of B", his objection is sufficient 
>> to 
>> 
>>> cancel the Declaration of an Emergency.
>>> And before anyone CFIs  on that, I draw your attention to the time that I 
>> tried 
>> 
>>> to usurp a  ministry (another "Consent of B" dependent action) and one 
>> objection 
>> 
>>> was sufficient to stop me from usurping the ministry. 
>>> 
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-201008/msg00050.html
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message  ----
>>>> From: Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 9:47:52 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] This  game is boring, let's have an Emergency.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu,  2010-12-09 at 09:22 -0800, Gabriel Vistica wrote:
>>>>> I cannot   recognize this CFI, as the entity known as "ais523" deregistered 
>> on 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> August 6, 2010 at approximately 1605 UTC and is therefore no  longer a  
>>>> Player.
>>>>> Original message: 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-201008/msg00024.html
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hmm, deregistered players can't CFI any more? That  seems a little
>>>> problematic in  times of ambiguity.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> ais523
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spoon-discuss   mailing list
>>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spoon-business mailing  list
>>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-discuss  mailing list
>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss