| M P Darke on Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:13:48 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Rulekeepor] Notice of editing (aka grammar Nazi-ness) |
Similarly, supercedes is a valid alternative spelling of supersedes.
--- On Wed, 17/11/10, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Rulekeepor] Notice of editing (aka grammar Nazi-ness)
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, 17 November, 2010, 2:24
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Section B - Judicial Kickbacks
> Paragraph 1: Misspelled word: "judgement". Corrected to "judgment". Misspelled
> word: "non-judgement". Corrected to "non-judgment".
For what it's worth, "judgement" is a valid alternate spelling which
is also used in Agora.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss