Re: [s-d] [s-b] Usurpation.

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The reports were correct at the time I posted them. It would have been inaccurate and misleading to state that changes had been made when they had not yet been made (passed proposals take effect at the end of the voting period and my reports were posted before the end of the voting period).

> From: bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:44:09 -0500
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Usurpation.
> 
> The rulekeepor report does not include the changes from nweek 176. The Metamin report does not include the newly created Ministry of Dirty Tricks. The Registrar report does not include the points I earned in nweek 176. Not correct = inaccurate and misleading.
> 
> 
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Gabriel Vistica wrote:
> 
> > I object to the stated usurpations.
> > 
> > Also, could you clarify how the reports you delivered Kicks for were misleading 
> > and/or incorrect?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 9:31:35 AM
> >> Subject: [s-b] Usurpation.
> >> 
> >> With consent of B, I intend to usurp the Ministry of Change and the Ministry of  
> >> the Registrar specifying an award of 10 for  each.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> spoon-business  mailing list
> >> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss