Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:27:35 -0400
> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:49 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:06:14 -0400
> >> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
> >> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:41 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:49:28 -0400
> >> >> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d]  Multiple names, part two.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:43 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > In that case I make it 11 Kicks in the Ass. I'll take 5.
> >> >>
> >> >> NttPF, and you have to tell us who you're kicking anyhow. Like this:
> >> >>
> >> >> For each of the following names, I kick all players who have that name
> >> >> and are not me in the ass: {{Marr965}}, {{compsciguy}}, {{JamesB}},
> >> >> {{Murphy}}, {{Gitchel, The One and Only Respected One}}. In all cases,
> >> >> the kicks are for failing to obey the requirements of Rule 2.
> >> >>
> >> >> [[Guys, you had three ndays to come up with unique names. Only 0x44,
> >> >> formerly Rule --9999, chose to do so. (I'm not kicking players who
> >> >> didn't post in the meantime, since kicking people for not paying
> >> >> attention seems unsporting.) Note that the validity of these kicks can
> >> >> only be determined pending 0x44's judgement on CFI 123A1.]]
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Kicks cannot be given in response to inaction: "Whenever a player performs an action that is on the List of Generally Abhorred
> >> > Stuff in a public forum, any player may respond in a public forum to the forum message containing that action, indicating that
> > e is
> >> > giving that player a Kick in the Ass, and the reason why, specifying the name of the player performing the action that is on the
> >> > LOGAS."
> >> >
> >> > I did fail to perform an action which the rules say I must do but I did not do it to the Public Forum. In any case, I'm not
> >> > recognizing these.
> >>
> >> The action of not doing things you are required to do is on the LOGAS.
> >
> >
> > You can't not do an action to the public forum, so that entry on the LOGAS is unenforcible. If you believe I'm wrong then please
> > indicate the public forum message in which I failed to change my name within 3 ndays or 3 wdays.
> 
> You failed to change your name to the PF.
> 
> I contend that if performing an action requires no post, for example
> if it happens automatically, then it happens publicly unless the rules
> somehow make it possible for it not to be.


Yes, but Kicks in the Ass require you to respond to a Public Forum message. 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss