Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

Murphy wrote:

> 
> teucer wrote:
> 
> > For each of the following names, I kick all players  who have that name
> > and are not me in the ass: {{Marr965}},  {{compsciguy}}, {{JamesB}},
> > {{Murphy}}, {{Gitchel, The One and Only  Respected One}}. In all cases,
> > the kicks are for failing to obey the  requirements of Rule 2.
> > 
> > [[Guys, you had three ndays to come up  with unique names. Only 0x44,
> > formerly Rule --9999, chose to do so. (I'm  not kicking players who
> > didn't post in the meantime, since kicking  people for not paying
> > attention seems unsporting.) Note that the  validity of these kicks can
> > only be determined pending 0x44's judgement  on CFI 123A1.]]
> 
> I argue that these kicks are invalid, as "having uniquely  identifying
> names" is not an action, and thus Rule 14 is silent on the  definition
> of "must" in this context.
> 
> CFI:  Multiple Kicks in the  Ass may be given in response to a failure
> to act, provided that at least one  Kick in the Ass may be given in
> response to  it.

In addition, all the players named above had those names before you allegedly 
gained those names. As such, you should be the one being Kicked, not us.



      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss