Re: [s-d] [s-b] Multiple names, part two.

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

Did I miss an email or something? When did 0x44 get assigned to hear the appeal?



----- Original Message ----
> From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed, July 28, 2010 5:49:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d]  Multiple names, part two.
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:43 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> > In that case I make it 11 Kicks in the Ass. I'll take  5.
> 
> NttPF, and you have to tell us who you're kicking anyhow. Like  this:
> 
> For each of the following names, I kick all players who have that  name
> and are not me in the ass: {{Marr965}}, {{compsciguy}},  {{JamesB}},
> {{Murphy}}, {{Gitchel, The One and Only Respected One}}. In all  cases,
> the kicks are for failing to obey the requirements of Rule  2.
> 
> [[Guys, you had three ndays to come up with unique names. Only  0x44,
> formerly Rule --9999, chose to do so. (I'm not kicking players  who
> didn't post in the meantime, since kicking people for not  paying
> attention seems unsporting.) Note that the validity of these kicks  can
> only be determined pending 0x44's judgement on CFI 123A1.]]
> 
>  -  teucer
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business  mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss