Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 122

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

teucer wrote:

> While the second set of arguments is an excellent way of resolving any
> simultaneity issues here, I dispute the above.
> 
> Rule 60 makes it clear that titles are names. Specifically, all names
> defined by the rules to be titles are titles; "Respected One" is so
> defined. While Rule 2 says that any references in the rules to
> "Respected One" don't mean the player so named, the reference in Rule
> 49 is to the title (name) itself, not the player who has it. It's the
> title that is lost, and the player loses the title. Ergo, rule 2 does
> not block rule 49 from having an impact.

"X holds the title Y" (as defined by Rule 60) is arguably a separate
concept from "X's name is Y", due to the distinct verb.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss