James Baxter on Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:28:25 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123 |
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:47:21 -0400 > From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx > To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 123 > > > > > > > You're the Plaintiff so you can't have been assigned, that means my statement unambiguously refers to the player known as > > compsciguy who is not the Plaintiff. > > False. The Plaintiff is Murphy, and did not specify a Defendant. Ah, OK. I was thinking of CFI 122 and I misread the quote when I checked. This multiple names thing is complicated. _________________________________________________________________ http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/ We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss