|
Craig Daniel on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:15:24 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal to Prevent Name Confusion
|
- To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal to Prevent Name Confusion
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:15:20 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=QOqujf8kN/I8N6Lw+NVCX6HP+N91CFL4FUYyzjvtEGE=; b=FGjwU38H/7lT1//KFxbqYuMONgGd+SGdk4lMa/NlvR4Y7qVwUFUZM0LNBD2/S1IHoe Wv5ddGTgeHmz9CUHi7uDYs2Bb9+bGYhJee3DHmBbDz4SKqGeI2dKukoc6Qfij8Y+BIon q7fBGmjA28kS4G8ee1xjuijFKkzoqW4l9V4pg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gmRNKZg1+Fl5KsXaUdnjkZjmhn1/vqTi2ry/2ZrBBv2P3A1J4//SKkO3aCTJ8KyeyY 0W9FVWn+dbOu6WxAd2bN5qyHOuB3dpghWqdSkc6QQtsuXF+57wj6dh14VwvuS+HITNCJ LDTs41oC8sJ5sYBBIKLglalECQ5pypUm5EzZ8=
- In-reply-to: <E7EE17A5-922C-4A56-A04F-ADF5DB4A96F6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <E7EE17A5-922C-4A56-A04F-ADF5DB4A96F6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I should also note that immediately prior to being blanked out, I'm
pretty sure my name was not in fact Rule 700, as there were a series
of name changes between my registration (under that name) and my loss
of any name. Properly, I should best be renamed to my most recent
actual name.
But whatever you give me by proposal, I can always change it back to
what it's really supposed to be anyhow. By which I mean "Respected
One."
-
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss