|
Craig Daniel on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:04:38 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal to Prevent Name Confusion
|
- To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal to Prevent Name Confusion
- From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:04:25 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=w+oVYNu5LpBGPW8cAH2orO+D2MJwHZaz37UbKkd4gEY=; b=TTLMUQ/pKwnPdG2Uz7tMzbuKuIo81OTg5yzkg1ah82YZN/3Fja40JfNYeeHBQF3y5O qmHrE59ozykpWSglSghYAwAMBb1ct1V9uu0InVehKnSxWoL1X8GK2MyyxwluA6kvZe0o izXdAugDjNaZrMUWmIasLK0qbAf/WvQPfCY+s=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IRBguyStLgI41Lelp6eqT2E+WoYMoGumHWFTaHf+jmcys1EGkeYfkzKRhLK4q0UoAt qYkKjcNjwSDFb7KefNh1f90UtLWR5IIhSWUcE9RCj6x5DYQ1ePY0t2JvT+6hQshGkJ0c iuogigNfJfE+/G2b0qB+TJlCKtIf8r+Qkrs44=
- In-reply-to: <SNT109-W182BCF1D0F90FC64C06DC285B90@xxxxxxx>
- References: <569584.46758.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W182BCF1D0F90FC64C06DC285B90@xxxxxxx>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:41 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> However, I should point out that you have the names the wrong way round - teucer@xxxxxxxxx was known as "Rule 700" and
> quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx was known as "Codae".
>
I was planning on just not mentioning that part and seeing how much
confusion resulted.
- Codae
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss