Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171

Gabriel Vistica on Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:19:27 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171
From: Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278692363; bh=AR/XENoxFqthnH+ibtpQVv6NZl8/9QvVezVDRRAnic8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O/N46wXQuJB+XxjTqISBt84dc/u9NtnuuyFVrR3ph558AIbjawSA1qPvGnA/68bUj+AKejG9ppvIM4N7EstUY5LXJ/d3/JLm3TlZ1CqXTo6tJdA+8zxp8zW2DEOXYeSRvjj6WTxDAb0ROO2g6ZajBTfIbnbeQ+nkVOpcEVPoaOo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sQvqH/YMP04oJM5v2cBcabTLXgqOJfVvl3AzjmTIC07BG09co/Xn/vU9Pbb8J2dFggyCH8yr+I8OEegZC2wkOTMOJeXC7mjIhV5qz0ir3IArX0lb+PCAHoCniMdMCplZwoLXzAGOwmqJZ1gO1DXLhSEIlmUvZH/9AAsBkIb3vy8=;
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimSQXpMy3rOCi9cQHoyv-d8AlOdONyzjIvPXgfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <SNT109-W496ACD343758BF1AC6552E85B40@xxxxxxx> <AANLkTimSQXpMy3rOCi9cQHoyv-d8AlOdONyzjIvPXgfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes and no. The proposal will move the LOGAS into Rule 79, thereby simplifying 
the process of modifying the LOGAS. However, the proposal contained the LOGAS as 
it appeared at the time the proposal was written (and therefore, as it appears 
now, since it hasn't been modified). If the proposal passes, the Registrar will 
no longer be required to keep track of the LOGAS, as it will be codified into 
Rule 79, and therefore will be visible at all times, not just in the Registrar's 
nweekly report.

Also, the proposal hasn't actually passed yet. The LOGAS is still tracked by the 
Registrar. Today is Thirnight (the Clock is wrong, I'll post a timeline to 
Business in a minute), the Clock in On, and the voting period doesn't 
effectively end until 11:59:59 UTC today.

----- Original Message ----
> From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 3:52:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171
> 
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:59 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> > The LOGAS contains the following actions:
> >
> >  *Performing any action which the rules say a player MUST NOT (or SHALL NOT 
>but  CAN) do.
> > *Failing to perform any action which the rules say a player  MUST or SHALL do 
>within 3 ndays (or 3 wdays if the clock is  off)
> >
> 
> Wait, did previous entries in the LOGAS get removed by the  proposal? I
> was of the impression that they would not be, but might be  mistaken.
> 
> Either way, I now actually validly deserve this, and  formerly-Codae
> does unambiguously rather than just probably...
> 
> I kick  all nameless players in the ass.
> 
>   -
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing  list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mentor points?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Registrar] Roster and Report for Nweek 171
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread