Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's see what this does...

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

Apologies. I did not remember seeing "quesmarktion" receive a Kick in the Ass, only you.



----- Original Message ----
> From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thu, July 1, 2010 7:39:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's see what this does...
> 
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Gabriel Vistica <
> ymailto="mailto:gvistica@xxxxxxxxx"; 
> href="mailto:gvistica@xxxxxxxxx";>gvistica@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Per 
> Rule 2/0, "All game entities must have uniquely
> identifying names". 
> Since you apparently have no name, but another player already had no name, I 
> hereby give the player posting
> from "
> ymailto="mailto:quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
> href="mailto:quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" a Kick 
> in the Ass for starting a process that ended with them taking a player name 
> already in
> use.

This, I believe, is invalid for two reasons. 
> First, because not having
a name isn't a name, so the non-unique status of 
> namelessness is
irrelevant - although not having a uniquely-identifying name 
> is still
Kick-worthy because it has been requested that people who aren't 
> me
not break the rules, so the fact that it's not unique isn't not 
> enough
to make it unkickable. Second, because while the offense 
> is
Kick-worthy, I have already delivered a Kick over this, and 
> the
Registrar (who hasn't recognized any of this nonsense yet) 
> isn't
supposed to recognize multiple Kicks for one offense.


> -
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing 
> list

> href="mailto:spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx";>spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss