M P Darke on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:14:02 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Nature of CFIs

>   Here's what you wrote:
>>   Pursuant to CFI 112, I submit a CFI:
>>   {{
>>     Statement to be considered:
>>     {{
>>       The answer given by the first judge is now invalid.
>>     }}
>   How could this statement reasonably be interpreted in any way
>   other than "The answer [i.e. judgement] given by the first judge
>   [of CFI 112] is now invalid."?

Very easily. You clearly didn't read the entirety of the CFI. I stated in the "Background" section that this was a general case, rather than pertaining explicitly to CFI 112.

spoon-discuss mailing list